The Convention on Biological Diversity
What is the Convention on Biological Diversity?
The Convention on Biological Diversity is the most broadly subscribed international environmental treaty in the world. Opened for signature at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro Brazil in 1992, it currently (October 2009) has 193 Parties -192 States and the European Community - who have committed themselves to its three overall goals:
- the conservation of biodiversity;
- the sustainable use of its components and;
- the equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of the utilization of genetic resources.
As the Convention is legally binding; member parties are obliged to implement all of its provisions.
Importantly, the Convention emphasizes that the development of human societies worldwide goes hand in hand with sustainable usage of the products and services that biological diversity provide. This humanistic point of view has ensured that the conservation of biodiversity is now seen as a ‘common concern of humankind'. The Convention further explicitly sets principles for the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising from the use of genetic resources, notably those destined for commercial use. It also covers the rapidly expanding field of biotechnology, addressing technology development and transfer, benefit-sharing and biosafety.
The Secretariat of the Convention is located in Montreal.
Why is taxonomy important to the Convention on Biological Diversity?
Governments that have signed and ratified the CBD are legally obliged to conserve and sustainably use biodiversity. To achieve these ends they develop national biodiversity strategies and action plans, which should rime national economic development and environmental protection.
Key issues that are addressed in this process include the inventory, monitoring and safeguarding of biodiversity. The latter is achieved through the establishment of protected areas, the restoration of degraded ecosystems, the control of invasive alien species species, the control of genetic pollution caused by biotechnological processes, etc. It is the science of taxonomy - actively engaged in the detection, description and classification of organisms - that provides the baseline data to attend to these issues.
How does the Convention on Biological Diversity function?
The Conference of the Parties (COP) has established seven thematic programmes of work (i.e. Agricultural Biodiversity, Dry andSub-humid Lands Biodiversity, Forest Biodiversity, InlandWaters Biodiversity, Island Biodiversity, Marine and CoastalBiodiversity, Mountain Biodiversity.listed below) which correspond to some of the major biomes on the planet. Each programme establishes a vision for, and basic principles to guide future work. They also set out key issues for consideration, identify potential outputs, and suggest a timetable and means for achieving these. Implementation of the work programmes depends on contributions from Parties, the Secretariat, relevant intergovernmental and other organizations, but especially from motivated individuals. Periodically, the COP and its open-ended intergovernmental scientific advisory body known as the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) review the state of implementation of the work programmes.
The COP has also initiated work on key matters of relevance to all thematic areas. These cross-cutting issues correspond to the issues addressed in the Convention's substantive provisions in Articles 6-20, and provide bridges and links between the thematic programmes. Some cross cutting initiatives directly support work under thematic programmes, for example, the work on indicators provides information on the status and trends of biodiversity for all biomes. Others develop discrete products quite separate from the thematic programmes. The work done for these cross-cutting issues has led to a number of principles, guidelines, and other tools to facilitate the implementation of the CBD. The Global Taxonomy Initiative is one of the 17 cross-cutting issues.
Course
Biodiversity internationally - Key organisations and political agreements.
References
Adams, W.M. 2006. The Future of Sustainability: Re-thinking Environment and Development in the Twenty-first Century. Report of the IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting, 29-31 JAnuary 2006 1-19.
Adams W.M., brockington D., Dyson J., Vira B. 2003. Managing Tragedies: Understanding Conflict over Common Pool Resources. Science 302: 1915-1916. (web resources)
Anon 2005. Bridging the gulf. Nature 437: 595.
Balmford, A., Clegg, L., Coulson, T. & Taylor, J. 2002. Why Conservationists Should Heed Pokemon. Science 295: 2367b. (Txt)
Balmford, A. & Bond, W., 2005. Trends in the state of nature and their implications for human well-being. Ecology Letters 8: 1218-1234.
Balmford A., et al. 2005. The Convention on Biological Diversity's 2010 Target. Science 307: 212-213. (supplement)
Bloom, D.E. 1995. International Public Opinion on the Environment. Science 269: 354-358.
Carpenter, S.R., DeFries, R., Dietz, T., Mooney, H.A., Polasky, S., Reid, W.V. & Scholes, R.J. 2006. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment: Research Needs. Science 314: 257-258.
Causey, D., Janzen, D. H., Townsend Peterson, A., Vieglais, D., Krishtalka, L., Beach, J. H. & Wiley, E. O. 2004. Museum collections and taxonomy. Science 305: 1106-1107.
Diaz, S., Fargione, J., Chapin III, F. S. & Tilman, D. 2006. Biodiversity loss Threatens Human Well-Being. PLOS Biology 4: 1300-1305.
Dillehay, T. D., Ramirez, C., Pino, M., Collins, M. B., Rossen, J. & Pino-Navarro, J. D. 2008. Monte Verde: Seaweed, Food, Medicine and the Peopling of South America. Science 320: 784-786.
- Ehrlich P.R., Wilson E.O. 1991. Biodiversity Studies: Science and Politics. Science 253: 758-762.
Esquinas-Alcazar, J. 2005. Protecting crop genetic diversity for food security: political, ethical and technical challenges. Nature Reviews, Genetics 6: 946-953.
- Franklin, A. 2001. Convention sur la diversité biologique: le rôle de l'Institut royal des Sciences naturelles dans le Centre d'échange belge et le partenariat. Ambassades et Consulats 10-12.
Geeta R., Levy A., Hoch, M., Mark M. 2004. Taxonomists and the CBD. Science 305:1105.
Gilbert, N. 2009. Efforts to sustain biodiversity fall short. Nature 462: 263
Gilbert, N. 2010. Biodiversity law could stymie research. Nature 463: 598.
Huang H., Han X., Kang L. Raven P., Jackson P.W., Chen Y. 2002. Conserving Native Plants in China. Science 297: 935-936.
Lyal C.H.C., Weitzman A.L. 2004. Taxonomy: Exploring the Impediment. Science 305:1106.
Mace, G. et al. 2010. Biodiversity targets after 2010. COSUST, 6 pp.
Pethiyagoda, R. 2004. Biodiversity law has some unintended effects. Nature 429: 129.
Pinton, V. & Franklin A. 2009. Biodiversité, richesse de la Nature et des Hommes. Dimension 3 1:20-21.
Sachs, J. D. & Reid, W. V. 2006. Investments Toward Sustainable Development. Science 312: 1002.
Sala, O. E. et al. 2000. Global Biodiversity Scenarios for the Year 2100. Science 287: 1770-1774.
- Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2006. Guidance for promoting synergy among activities addressing biological diversity, desertification, land degradation and climate change. CBD Technical Series 1-4
- Scholes, R.J. et al. 2008. Towards a Global Biodiversity Observing System. Science 321: 1044-1045.
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2004. Addis Ababa Principles and Guidelines for the Sustainable Use of Biodiversity (CBD Guidelines) Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity 21 p.
Silva M. 2004. Bioinformatics, the Clearing-house Mechanism, and the Convention on Biological Diversity. Biodiversity Informatics. 1: 23-29.
Stokstad E. 2005. Taking the Pulse of Earth’s Life-Support Systems. Science 308: 41-43.
Stone R. 1994. Proposed Global Network for Ecology Data Stirs Debate. Science 266: 1155.
Tallis, H. & Kareiva, P. 2005. Ecosystem services. Current Biology 15: 746-748.
Tallis H.M., Kareiva P. 2006. Shaping global environmental decisions using socio-ecological models. TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution 21: 562-568.
ten Kate K. 2002. Science and the Convention on Biological Diversity. Science 295: 2371-2372.
Urho, N. 2009. Possibilities of enhancing co-operation and co-ordination among MEAs in the biodiversity cluster. TemaNord 537: 87 pp.
- Van Goethem, J. 1999. Het Verdrag inzake biologische diversiteit en de opvolging ervan in België. Biol. Jaarb. Dodonnea 66: 49-88 (in Dutch with English abstract).
Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco J. & Melillo J.M. 1997. Human Domination of Earth's Ecosystems. Science 277: 494-499.
Additional information is available in the Learn more folder.